Findings comply with Stephenson Harwood’s announcement final week that it’s going to scale back salaries by 20% if employees select to work at home full-time
The overwhelming majority of our readers say they might reject everlasting home-working if it meant a discount in wage.
Of the three,100 respondents to our LinkedIn poll, a whopping 88% mentioned they wouldn’t be ready to settle for the wage sacrifice, even when it meant no extra expensive London dwelling and early morning commute.
The findings comply with the information final week that employees at Metropolis legislation agency Stephenson Harwood will likely be allowed to work at home full time, however provided that they agree to take a pay cut of 20%. For newly certified associates on the agency, who’ve beginning salaries of £90,000, this could equate to a cut of £18,000.
Due to come into impact this month, the brand new agile choice made nationwide headlines and generated a vigorous debate inside our feedback part.
“Good”, one reader wrote. “More firms, especially London-based firms should be doing the same”. One other, in the meantime, defined how they might be ready to take up the provide, if the cut was nearer to 10% and so they had “no intention of making partner”.
Others had been much less welcoming of the coverage. “Are they charging their clients 20% less for their time, or requiring them to do 20% less hours?” one LC reader questioned. “Pretty poor considering how much more work some of us end up with at home to add a pay cut on top,” one other added.
However the query stays: will different huge authorized gamers comply with?
Would you take a pay cut to WFH completely? Tell us within the feedback 👇