The United States flag flies inside of Joint Task Force Guantanamo Camp VI at the U.S. naval base in Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, March 22, 2016.  REUTERS/Lucas Jackson

U.S. tells Supreme Court Guantanamo detainee can give limited testimony

Oct 17 (Reuters) – The administration of U.S. President Joe Biden knowledgeable the Supreme Court {that a} suspected high-ranking al Qaeda determine held on the American naval base at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, may present limited testimony about his torture by the hands of the CIA.

Earlier this month, U.S. Supreme Court justices questioned why the U.S. authorities is not going to let the detainee, Abu Zubaydah, testify. learn extra

Zubaydah, a Palestinian man captured in 2002 in Pakistan and held by the US since then with out costs, repeatedly underwent waterboarding, a type of simulated drowning extensively thought-about torture.

In response to questions from three justices throughout oral arguments earlier this month, Performing Solicitor Normal Brian Fletcher wrote a letter to the court docket on Friday informing the justices that Zubaydah may present a declaration within the pending case.

“Nonetheless, the government would permit Abu Zubaydah, upon his request, to send a declaration that could then be transmitted to the Polish investigation”, Fletcher wrote within the letter seen by Reuters on Sunday.

Nevertheless, he added that any info might be topic to redaction if it’d “prejudice the security interests of the United States.”

Poland is believed to be the situation of a “black site” the place the CIA used harsh interrogation methods in opposition to Zubaydah.

Zubaydah, now 50, has spent 15 years at Guantanamo and is one among many detainees nonetheless held there. He misplaced a watch and underwent waterboarding 83 instances in a single month whereas held by the CIA, U.S. authorities paperwork confirmed.

He was “an associate and longtime terrorist ally of Osama bin Laden,” the chief of the al Qaeda Islamist militant group killed by U.S. forces in Pakistan in 2011, a Justice Division submitting stated earlier.

Fletcher stated in his letter that Zubaydah’s testimony wouldn’t resolve the dispute that’s at present earlier than the justices regarding the scope of the “state secrets” privilege, a authorized doctrine accessible to the federal government to guard info that it says might threaten nationwide safety.

Reporting by Kanishka Singh in Bengaluru; Modifying by Stephen Coates

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source link