Start prep with BARBRI this month
Twenty-two aspiring social welfare lawyers have commenced their preparation to take a seat the Solicitors Qualifying Examination (SQE) due to a brand new scholarship fund backed by an alliance of prime legislation firms and authorized charities.(*22*)
The Social Welfare Solicitors Qualification Fund (SWSQF), which Authorized Cheek first reported on final 12 months, appears to help individuals already working in social welfare legislation however who aren’t legally certified.
The SWSQF has now secured funding for its first 22 social welfare authorized staff, chosen from a aggressive pool of candidates, to begin their research with BARBRI this month. The fund hopes to make a dozen awards yearly and likewise covers evaluation prices.
As soon as certified, every lawyer delivers over 1,200 social welfare legislation hours yearly, making a major nationwide affect on a sector in vital want of help.
The City of London Legislation Society and Younger Authorized Help Lawyers are behind the scheme, with monetary help courtesy of 18 City legislation firms.
They’re: Addleshaw Goddard, Allen & Overy, Ashurst, Clifford Probability, Clyde & Co, Eversheds Sutherland, Freshfields, Latham & Watkins, Linklaters, Macfarlanes, Norton Rose Fulbright, Shoosmiths, Simmons & Simmons, Stephenson Harwood, Travers Smith, Trowers & Hamlins, Weil Gotshal and White & Case.
Commenting on the fund, Dame Alison Saunders, former director of public prosecutions and now a associate at Linklaters, stated:
“The Social Welfare Solicitors Qualification Fund is a great initiative and really important. I have seen first-hand the impact of not having enough criminal legal aid lawyers who are vital to ensuring that all members of society have access to justice which is a fundamental part of the rule of law. I welcome legal organisations financially supporting the initiative.”
The funding initiative follows analysis published last year by the Legislation Society which confirmed over three-quarters of the inhabitants (78%) do not need entry to a welfare authorized help supplier, “leaving them unable to challenge or appeal decisions”.