Police release tear gas into a crowd of pro-Trump protesters during clashes at a rally to contest the certification of the 2020 U.S. presidential election results by the U.S. Congress, at the U.S. Capitol Building in Washington, U.S, January 6, 2021. REUTERS/Shannon Stapleton//File Photo

Thousands of hours of U.S. Capitol riot videos swamp attorneys

WASHINGTON, Oct 26 (Reuters) – The 1000’s of hours of video of the lethal assault on the U.S. Capitol by Donald Trump supporters have overwhelmed the prosecutors and protection attorneys dealing with the tons of of legal instances and are delaying trials for some defendants.

The Jan. 6 assault, an try and reverse President Joe Biden’s November 2020 election win, produced an infinite quantity of video – from safety cameras across the Capitol, worn by cops below assault and filmed by the rioters themselves, many of whom then posted their exploits to social media for the world to see.

Because the Justice Division prosecutes greater than 650 individuals on expenses starting from trespassing to assaulting police, it’s struggling to share the sheer quantity of proof with defendants and their attorneys.

Protection attorneys and at the very least one federal decide have warned the delays could also be infringing on defendants’ rights to speedy trials.

U.S. District Choose Amit Mehta raised that concern throughout an October listening to for 17 members or associates of the right-wing Oath Keepers, whose trial on expenses together with conspiracy and assaulting legislation enforcement officers he reluctantly agreed to delay till April.

“We’ve got to get to a point soon where defense counsel has reasonable access to this information. It’s just not acceptable any longer to keep hearing that the government is continuing to work on this,” Mehta stated.

“I understand it’s an unprecedented case. An unprecedented amount of information. But what’s not unprecedented is that we’ve got defendants charged with serious crimes … and they’ve got rights, constitutional and statutory, to get to a trial if that’s what they want.”

The U.S. Structure ensures the suitable to a trial inside 70 days, although that deadline is usually prolonged to present defendants time to overview proof.


The Justice Division has amassed a lot video proof that it might take virtually 9 months, operating 24 hours a day, to display all of it: 16,925 particular person closed-circuit videos operating a mixed 4,800 hours, and 1,600 extra hours of video taken by cops’ body-worn cameras, based on an Oct. 22 courtroom submitting. Protection attorneys got directions for accessing that video database on Oct. 18.

A second database containing greater than 100,000 data from the FBI and different companies just isn’t but accessible, the Justice Division stated.

It is common for main prosecutions to generate large quantities of proof. The 2013 Boston Marathon bombing investigation, as an illustration, generated 33 terabytes of knowledge – the equal of 16,000 hours of high-definition video – together with tons of of photos from surveillance cameras.

However in that and different high-profile prosecutions, such because the 2017 New York truck assault that killed eight individuals and the 2016 bombings round New York and New Jersey that injured 31, there was only one defendant.

That made sharing proof simpler, as there was one protection group for prosecutors to speak with and far of the proof centered on one particular person.

The Jan. 6 instances, some of which have already been resolved by plea offers, are extra daunting: Hours of video present giant crowds operating by way of the Capitol, smashing home windows and assaulting cops. Anyone video could depict dozens of defendants.

With every new arrest, extra proof is unearthed that might be related in different instances.

New video proof was unearthed in opposition to Robert Reeder, of Maryland, the morning that he was scheduled to be sentenced on misdemeanor expenses. That led prosecutors to postpone the sentencing to find out if they’d pursue extra felony expenses based mostly on the brand new proof.

They in the end determined in opposition to it and the decide ordered him to serve three months.


The delays are of added significance to the 37 Jan. 6 defendants awaiting trial within the Washington, D.C., jail.

The Washington Division of Corrections stated in an announcement that it has “a several-weeks-long waitlist” for inmates to entry proof.

“They have very limited numbers of laptops that are available for all of the residents in the facility, and it is a four-to-six-week wait, at a minimum, before one can get the discovery,” stated Michelle Peterson, an lawyer for Oath Keepers defendant Jessica Watkins, who faces conspiracy and different expenses, throughout a courtroom listening to.

U.S. Legal professional Common Merrick Garland was warned throughout his first briefing on the Jan. 6 investigation in regards to the challenges posed by the mountain of proof.

In that March 11 assembly, a senior official proposed a plan that might fast-track getting proof rapidly to individuals in custody or these charged in complicated conspiracy instances.

The plan additionally referred to as for the Justice Division to rapidly resolve much less complicated instances with plea offers, a transfer designed to ease the federal government’s burden to supply proof as a result of defendants sometimes waive their discovery rights.

However as of Oct. 6, solely about 90 defendants have pleaded responsible.

Julian Khater, who’s charged with assaulting Capitol Police, was in jail virtually seven months earlier than he was given entry to the video proof, stated his lawyer Chad Seigel.

4 individuals died on the day of the violence, one shot lifeless by police and the opposite three of pure causes.

U.S. District Choose Paul Friedman acknowledged the weird challenges for prosecution and protection throughout a listening to the place one defendant was in search of a speedy trial.

“This is a unique case in many, many ways which cuts both ways,” he stated at an Oct. 19 listening to. “You can’t sit around forever and wait for every piece of discovery and every video.”

Reporting by Sarah N. Lynch; Enhancing by Scott Malone and Grant McCool

Our Requirements: The Thomson Reuters Trust Principles.

Source link