The UAE Introduces the Concept of A New Single-Tier Court

Pursuant to Article (30) bis (2) of Federal Decree Legislation No. 15 of 2021 Amending Sure Provisions of the Civil Process Code (CPC) and Article 3 of Cupboard Decision No. 75 of 2021 Amending Sure Provisions of Cupboard Decision No. 57 of 2018, the UAE has launched the idea of a brand new single-tier courtroom (Single-Tier Court) for the decision of sure instances.

Article (30) bis (2) of the CPC, launched by Federal Decree Legislation No. 15 of 2021, gives that the Minister of Justice or the President/Chairman of the native judicial authority could difficulty a call to determine a Single-Tier Court. Such people even have the energy to difficulty any choices (logistical, administrative or procedural) which are vital for the operation of this courtroom, offered that such choices don’t battle with the provisions of the CPC.

This Single-Tier Court can be shaped of three judges headed by a decide from the Federal Supreme Court or native Court of Cassation, sitting alongside an appellate decide and a primary occasion decide, every of which shall be seconded or appointed in accordance with the laws regulating every authority.

As soon as established, the Single-Tier Court shall have necessary jurisdiction over sure varieties of dispute; nonetheless, events may choose in to the jurisdiction of this courtroom.

It seems that the Single-Tier Court is meant to facilitate the fast and environment friendly decision of disputes, by expediting the preparatory levels of the case and by the courtroom rendering a closing, non-appealable and instantly enforceable judgment.


This Single-Tier Court can have jurisdiction to resolve sure civil, actual property, industrial and inheritance instances. There isn’t a indication of what sort of civil, actual property, industrial instances, solely that such instances shall be decided by a call from the Minister of Justice or the President/Chairman of the native judicial authority.

Events may choose in to the jurisdiction of the Single-Tier Court both earlier than or after the dispute has arisen. Nevertheless, there are restrictions as to the varieties of instances that may be referred to the Single-Tier Court. The Single-Tier Court won’t have jurisdiction over, for instance: legal, administrative and labour instances; private standing instances (i.e. household issues resembling marriage, divorce and custody disputes) with the exception of inheritance; non permanent or abstract orders and requests that may be submitted independently as a important continuing reasonably than purely as ancillary reduction (resembling an order on petition pursuant to Article 62 of the CPC); and instances which have already been filed earlier than the legally competent courts previous to the institution of the Single-Tier Court.

In all instances, the request for reduction have to be for a selected worth and the case worth should not be lower than the prescribed threshold for interesting a case from the Court of Enchantment to the Court of Cassation, which, at current, is AED 500,000.

If a case is introduced earlier than a federal or native courtroom in respect of which there’s an settlement between the events to refer the case to the Single-Tier Court, the federal or native courtroom shall decline to listen to the case if the defendant raises a jurisdictional objection earlier than making any submissions or arguments on the deserves of the case. There are solely two listed exceptions: (i) if it seems that the material of the dispute doesn’t fall inside the jurisdiction of the Single-Tier Court; or (ii) if the dispute can’t be referred to the Single-Tier Court because it has not but been established.


A case earlier than the Single-Tier Court can be filed in the unusual method. Nevertheless, in contrast to the common courts, the recording, preparation and administration of instances earlier than the Single-Tier Court shall be carried out by a decide known as the “preparation judge”, who shall have all the powers and duties vested in the case supervisor and supervising decide.

After the declare has been filed, the opposing social gathering can be notified in the typical method. The discover procedures are the similar as these in the common courts, with the exception of notification by publication, which might not be permitted.

The preparation decide shall invite the events to attempt to settle the matter. If a settlement is reached, the decide shall doc and approve the similar, and the settlement minutes shall have the pressure of a writ of execution.

After completion of the preparation of the case, the preparation decide shall schedule a listening to for pleading earlier than the Single-Tier Court. In doing so, the preparation decide should undergo the courtroom, together with the case file, a memorandum of opinion that features the material of the case, the two events’ arguments and factors of disagreement, the rules of the Supreme Court on the material of the dispute and the preparation decide’s authorized opinion. This course of of making ready the case shall not take longer than 30 working days from the date on which the case was filed.

Thereafter, the proceedings shall be performed in the similar manner as the common courts.


As soon as the Single-Tier Court has issued its judgment, it shall be succesful of rapid enforcement by the Execution Decide, with out the want for discover, in the regular course.

The judgment of the Single-Tier Court shall be closing, enforceable and never topic to attraction, besides by means of a petition for reconsideration (i.e. reconsideration by the similar courtroom) in accordance with Articles 169 to 172 of the CPC or in the occasion that discover was invalidly served.

A judgment of the Single-Tier Court may be retracted in accordance with the new Article (187) bis of the CPC. This gives that the courtroom could retract a call by itself initiative or at the request of a celebration in opposition to whom the resolution or judgment was issued in sure situations: if the resolution or judgment was tainted by a procedural error that has affected the conclusion reached; the resolution was based mostly on a repealed regulation and the utility of the appropriate regulation would change the opinion reached in the case; or if the resolution or judgment was issued in contradiction of established authorized rules.

An utility for retraction by a celebration in opposition to whom the resolution or judgment has been issued shall be issued to the President of the Federal Supreme Court or the President of the native Court of Cassation, signed by a lawyer who has rights of viewers earlier than such courtroom, and accompanied by a safety deposit of AED 20,000.

If the retraction is on the courtroom’s personal initiative, the utility shall be referred by its president and accompanied by a report from the courtroom technical workplace.

The utility for retraction shall be thought-about by a panel shaped of 5 of the most senior judges of the Federal Supreme Court or the President of the native Court of Cassation (offered that none of the judges issued the judgment or resolution that’s being challenged). This panel shall difficulty a reasoned resolution on the utility for retraction by a majority of 4 judges.

In all instances, an utility for retraction could solely be submitted as soon as, and can’t be made if multiple 12 months has lapsed since the date of issuance of the closing judgment or resolution issued in chambers.


This novel idea of a Single-Tier Court to facilitate fast and cost-effective decision of claims could also be interesting to litigants in the UAE. That is notably so on condition that events to disputes earlier than the federal or native UAE courts are sometimes required to attend years for a closing dedication, in spite of everything avenues of attraction have been exhausted. Nevertheless, the regulation presently solely gives a framework for this Single-Tier Court and there stay many questions as to the way it will work in apply, resembling the exact scope of its jurisdiction, whether or not it is ready to decide claims in an expedited method, and the perceived high quality of the judgments rendered. Litigants may be reluctant to opt-in to the jurisdiction of the Single-Tier Court, as doing so would require them to give up the computerized proper to attraction that exists in the common courts and settle for that any judgment rendered by the Single-Tier Court is straight away enforceable. Nevertheless, it might be a pretty choice in instances the place it is crucial that the dispute is resolved rapidly, or the place the quantities in dispute don’t justify the time or expense of attraction proceedings.

Source link