Oxford v Cambridge moot debacle shows that even top law students make mistakes

Howlers on either side in aftermath of face-off

A moot has sparked a weird row between the elite universities of Oxford and Cambridge.

After Cambridge received Herbert Smith Freehills‘ Incapacity Mooting Championship final 12 months, Oxford mistakenly claimed victory, posting in error on its web site that “[i]n a very close decision, Oxford were awarded the win”.

Definitely that’s not the type of consideration to element that would get you a TC at HSF.

Regardless of having no proof that the put up was something greater than an sincere mistake, students at Cambridge determined to impute sinister motives after noticing it had been stay for over a 12 months. So earlier this month, as pleasure constructed round this 12 months’s version of the mooting competitors, they launched into a weird social media marketing campaign that appeared to make out their rivals had informed a deliberate “lie”.

A flurry of TikTok’s that made this allegation in a supposedly “light-hearted” means have since been made non-public whereas a tweet doing the identical has been deleted.

As an insider at Cambridge informed us: “Nothing gets Cambridge students quite revved up as a little drama within this age-old rivalry!”

Once more, not the form of factor that would clinch you a spot at a number one world law agency.

The HSF moot competitors is ready up by Oxford’s Law School and has been working since 2014. Final 12 months’s moot centred on whether or not a prosthetic limb may be thought to be an imitation firearm, and whether or not harm to a mobility help can not quantity to precise bodily hurt.



Source link