The continuing rivalry between Adidas and Nike hit a brand new milestone this week when Adidas filed its first federal lawsuit towards Nike. The lawsuit was filed in East Texas federal court with Adidas alleging Nike infringed on 9 of its patents associated to smartphone apps and adjustable shoe tech. The apps embody Nike Run Membership, Coaching Membership, and SNKRS apps. The alleged infringed patents relate to app capabilities such as audio suggestions throughout exercises, GPS monitoring, coaching plans, and integration with third-party equipment like coronary heart price displays.
The power to order and purchase limited-edition sneakers can also be at subject as a result of Adidas’ Confirmed app, launched in 2015, permits prospects insider entry to its manufacturers and unique sneaker releases, and Nike’s SNKRS app, launched quickly thereafter, permits for related capabilities.
Concerning adjustable shoe tech, Adidas stated in the criticism that in 2004, “it launched the world’s first intelligent running shoe, the Adidas 1 which sensed and adjusted the comfort of the shoe while the shoe was worn.” Moreover, in 2005, Adidas launched “the first fully integrated training system combining sensors in shoes and wearable devices.” Adidas alleged that Nike’s adjustable Adapt sneakers infringe the Adidas 1 sneaker.
This go well with comes after Nike filed a criticism towards Adidas in December in Oregon federal courtroom and the U.S. Worldwide Commerce Fee, alleging Adidas’ footwear infringed on Nike’s Flyknit sneaker design. This rivalry goes even additional again, with Nike suing Adidas in East Texas in 2005, alleging a number of of Adidas’ footwear violated two patents associated to shoe design.
Whereas that is the primary time Adidas has filed a lawsuit towards Nike in federal courtroom, the options in query have an extended historical past of litigation. Adidas beforehand sued Beneath Armour for its Map My Fitness app. This case was settled, with Beneath Armour agreeing to pay Adidas a licensing payment. Right here, Adidas is in search of damages and a courtroom order stopping Nike from “directly or indirectly infringing one or more” of the patents concerned. As a result of the options at subject, such as GPS route monitoring, are quite common with health apps in the present day, this case might have main implications for the long run of health apps.