Ex-magic circle lawyer loses legal battle to force wealthy parents to pay him maintenance for life

Faiz Siddiqui, 41, claimed he was totally depending on them due to well being points

A former magic circle lawyer has misplaced his courtroom bid to force his wealthy parents to pay him maintenance for life.

Oxford College graduate Faiz Siddiqui, 41, claimed he was totally depending on his aged parents and was entitled to their monetary assist as a “vulnerable” grownup youngster of theirs with well being points.

For 20 years that they had put up their son, who skilled as a solicitor at Clifford Likelihood and went on to practise at different massive title outfits however is now mentioned to be unemployed, in a £1 million flat they personal close to London’s Hyde Park. Additionally they paid his payments and gave him £400 spending cash per week.

However following a household row, Siddiqui’s parents wished to scale back their stage of assist, triggering a legal problem by their son.

It was rejected by household courtroom decide Sir James Munby final yr and introduced as a take a look at case to the Courtroom of Enchantment in March 2021.

The case, which might’ve recast the legal guidelines on parental obligations to their grownup youngsters, was thrown out by the Courtroom of Enchantment on Tuesday.

Justin Warshaw QC of 1 Hare Courtroom, who represented Siddiqui’s parents, mentioned: “These long-suffering parents have reached their own view of what is suitable provision for their difficult, demanding and pertinacious 41-year-old son.”

He added: “His skeleton argument is littered with emotive references to ‘child’ and ‘children’. To be clear, this is a man in his 40s, seeking financial support from his elderly parents — 69 and 71 years old, respectively.”

“It goes without saying that the parents are devastated that they are being put through this ordeal by their son and that they are being put to such enormous expense, particularly when set against their historic and ongoing generosity towards him,” Warsaw mentioned.

Backing the argument, the judges dominated that “whatever the moral position might be, parents should be under no legal duty to support their adult children, however grave their need”.

Siddiqui’s newest courtroom defeat comes almost 5 years after he tried to sue his former college when he failed to safe a first-class diploma. His £1 million compensation declare was struck out by the Excessive Courtroom in 2018.

Source link