The provisions to date introduced for the federal government’s Bill of Rights will put the UK on a collision course with the rule of legislation, the Legislation Society mentioned this morning.
‘The erosion of accountability trumpeted by the justice secretary indicators a deepening of the federal government’s disregard for the checks and balances that underpin the rule of legislation,’ Society president I. Stephanie Boyce mentioned in response to the announcement. ‘The invoice will create an appropriate class of human rights abuses in the UK – by introducing a bar on claims deemed to not trigger “significant disadvantage”.’
This is able to quantity to ‘a lurch backwards for British justice’, Boyce mentioned. ‘Authorities could start to think about some rights violations as acceptable, as a result of these might now not be challenged beneath the Bill of Rights regardless of being towards the legislation.’
The Society was not the one physique to sentence the measure forward of publication. In a press release marketing campaign group Amnesty Worldwide described the invoice as ‘a large leap backwards for the rights of atypical folks’.
Sacha Deshmukh, chief government, Amnesty Worldwide UK, mentioned: ‘Ripping up the Human Rights Act means the general public is being stripped of its strongest software to problem wrongdoing by the federal government and different public our bodies. This isn’t about tinkering with rights, it’s about eradicating them.’
In the meantime Sophie Kemp, companion and head of public legislation at London agency Kingsley Napley, mentioned: ‘Calling Dominic Raab’s proposals a “Bill of Rights” is one other Orwellian flip from this authorities. It’s, actually, a worrying “Bill of Restrictions”.’